And Our Composting Begins …

Many years ago, we tried composting. It was fun at first – we bought a pitchfork to turn the pile, we dumped our scraps in the pile, and we even got some rich dirt once. Then the pile grew. Then the pile grew again. Then we didn’t turn it. Then it grew again. Well, you can probably guess the next 5-10 sentences in the story. Eventually, the compost pile busted out of the metal screen that held it in place and was just a big pile. I am not sure if “pile” is even the right word. Towards the end of our previous composting journey, the pile looked more Snufalufagus from Sesame Street – a big brown hairy, pine straw-ish mess.

This new composter we have is from Sun Cast and it tumbles on an axis.  Buddy and Claire love turning it which is great so we might have help.  In a few months, I will update on our little adventure into composting – Composting 2.0. I hope you enjoy the before and after pictures …

 

-Dana

Bear and Her Painted Turtle

Mom, Buddy and Bear found a painted turtle on the way to the bus stop this morning. Bear loved it as you can see from the photo. It looks like mom’s love of animals and nature is rubbing off on them!

- Dana

20110425-012950.jpg

Being an Expert is Knowing and Learning

The word Expert is very much a misused word. In speaking with a friend recently, they let me know that they were looking for candidates for a position and they had hired a search firm to get the top 10 experts in a field to be candidates. At first, I was happy that they were going to get the best of the best. As I digested the conversation more fully, I began to disagree with the approach. Why hire an expert – i.e., someone who has documented, great accomplishments in a particular field? Those accomplishments are already achieved, by definition, and some other company is already reaping the benefits of them. I know that I read in many financial statements that “Past performance is not a guarantee of future results”. What does it mean to be an expert in a field or profession? My father used to always crack this corny joke – “Are you out standing in your field?” my reply was always “Yes” even though I knew his response was something like “why are you out in a field? Come back inside.” I don’t think he meant much more than just the joke but I will try to use that to help explain my perspective that being an expert is not an entity state but more of a continual journey and subsequently, if you have attained the label of expert that you may not be am expert.

In my work as a technology leader, I am known for setting goals that people think they can’t achieve and have lists of reasons why they can’t hit them. I’ve been coached to “set realistic goals” for the past 20 years but I never do and I don’t understand why I ever would. In fact, nobody has been able to define what a “realistic” goal is or why it should be something lower / easier than what I requested. The conversations go something like this:

Me – “Hi, person xyz. Lets discuss your goals for the year. ”
XYZ – “I have set a stretch goal of doing 5% better than last year.”
Me – “Great to see. How did you determine the percentage?”
XYZ – “well, 5% seems achievable given ”
Me – “Ok. What does the business need to be world class?”
XYZ – “I didn’t look at that but some are operating at a level much, much higher than this.”
Me – “Ok. Would you prefer to be 5% better or world class?” Before they can answer, “Let’s agree to have a goal of being world ass because I have no interest in being #2. Don’t worry, you won’t be in this alone. The company needs you to be a success and so the team will pitch in and help you every step of the way. I know you can and want to do this.”

The conversation has shifted and now I have the burden of proof to demonstrate that the much higher goal is achievable and worth the effort. This is very important and often a fatal flaw of companies. In every market there is someone inventing a disruptive technology, process, ad campaign, whatever which will make others obsolete. Has 5% or some other micro improvement ever really made a difference? Has it made an employee happy to be barely better than before and be done? Or do people / companies get motivated by being on a path to excellence? How will you feel when our area becomes obsolete and you are looking for the next thing?

My son is taking Tae Kwon Do now and is doing really well. He is young has not been bound by normal rules of society yet. He is inquisitive and excited by many things. He comes home from TKD excited to become the “ultimate” – a black belt.  Two years of training is a very long time for him and is world class in his mind. He talks about being a black belt every day without fail. But he does something else that I love and want to adapt to the business world – he is super excited when he gets a stripe or a new belt or a new kick / block / punch. It is important to k ow the advancement process. First you learn a new move, then you practice it, then you demonstrate it for the “Master”, & then you get a stripe. You repeat this process for 5 stripes and after that, you test for a new belt. There are 15 belts from white to black and it takes about 2-3 years to attain 1st degree black belt. My son gets excited about the new moves, the stripes and the belts. But why … because he wants to be an “expert” or “master” not because he wants to be just 6.7% better (1 belt further of the 15).

He is intrinsically motivated to be an expert / master and extrinsically motivated to get a new belt. His goal is Black Belt not the next belt. I believe he will make it too. Little does he know that the ultimate belt is 10th degree which has an asymptotic path because you achieve that after death and a lifetime of TKD.

In the end an expert is not just someone who has attained something but also knows that they are not finished learning to be an expert. When my son gets his black belt, he will be one of the 5% that start and actually make it to black belt. Then, I will tell him about his asymptotic climb to 10th degree.

-Dana

IT Strategy – Make It Relevant

Strategy to me is all about winning and hopefully sustained winning over a long period of time.  Of course, the duration of winning has multiple variables – regulatory changes, competition, consumer needs, etc. Implementation and execution (which require long-term, simple objectives, a complete understanding of the competitive landscape and a very object lens of internal capability)  are keys to a successful strategy. Without becoming too academic, we can just settle on business strategy being a means of finding, utilizing and maintaing a competitive advantage in the industry the business competes.  There are more detailed definitions and since this is about IT Strategy, we will stay fairly basic with the overall definition.

Often, I will engage in riveting discussions related to what technology could do for different businesses with new IT professionals. The number one topic that always comes out of those discussions is something like “but the business won’t fund it” or something similar. Does this sound familiar? The simple matter for technology professionals to remember is that businesses deal with a cost of funds and that initiatives will be judged against each other bared on the ability of that initiative to make a return above that cost of funds. Business capabilities will be judged on their long term value to a firm.

Historically, business strategists have viewed technology as something they fund. This is a myopic view which limits technology to being the servers, the coders, the network, the data centers, power, large pieces of real estate to house all of this, etc. While all of this may be part of technology, we have ourselves (the technology community) to thank for that. In recent years, we have talked in our terms which either confused the non-technorati because it was technical beyond belief or we spoke in terms of “buying servers and software”. Best case for technology is that we were able to sell it as a series of projects. This falls short.

Technology is more than servers and code. It is key to delivering deep operational changes for lines of businesses which deliver sustainable competitive advantage. The most direct way to do this is to describe technology in terms of business processes which are key to revenue generation, expense reduction, creating access to new markets, or increasing associate productivity. Speaking of IT in terms of a capability enabling business processes demonstrates ITs deep integration and can change the view of technology from an “initiative” to something powerful and strategic.

- Dana

Smart Urgency – Parkinson & Pareto

Through a conversation with colleagues, I realized that a common problem plaguing Information Technology is that a number of us have teams that don’t understand what urgency really is. Half of the table has explained urgency to their team as doing things faster and the other half explained urgency in terms of working smarter not harder. My opinion is a little bit different than both of those.

Urgency is defined as having a sense of imperativeness. That’s just so academic. If you say that or something similar in a room full of people, everyone will nod their head and agree. Then, of course, they will leave the meeting and do the same old thing. We all know that humans are creatures of habit and we need to start working harder on organizational muscle memory. As we lead our teams, we need to keep in mind that urgency needs to occur at the individual person level, the overall organization level and the leader of the team level.

To help people connect with the concept of urgency, I speak about two laws which are in different degrees known in corporations – Parkinson’s Law and the Pareto Principle. Perhaps the lesser known of the two is Parkinson’s Law. I jokingly refer to Parkinson’s Law with my team and the conversation goes something like this:

“Do you know how long it takes to write code?”
“Well, it depends on how you many requirements you have”
“Not exactly – things takes as long as you let them”

Cyril Northcote Parkinson created his law as “Work expands so as to fill time available for its completion” and he thought of this while serving in the British Civil Service. Modern adaptations tend to be geared towards computers and as such “Data expands to fill the space available for storage.”  Let’s stop for a second a think about what we do in the normal day.  A quick glance at my calendar tomorrow shows a day full of meetings starting early in the morning for EST and ending at close of business for PST. In between, I can almost guarantee that I will answer phone calls which serve less than expected, I will answer email as it comes to me, and I will receive close to 1 instant message every 2-5 minutes.  At first glance, perhaps there is a correlation to Parkinson’s Law?  I am pretty sure there is.

The next step will be to look at the contents of my day.  And first, we can take in a quick reminder of Vilfredo Pareto’s Pareto Principle or Pareto Efficiency. It is used as a common rule of thumb in business and I am sure that you have heard of it something like “80% of your sales come from 20% of your clients” or a derivative therein. This can be interpreted as it is wise to do the 20% that will give you the 80% of results you are looking for. Even though, we all agree … we will all try to answer every single email, every phone call, etc.

If you only ever do the things that yield 80% (i.e., follow only Pareto’s Principle), what is to keep you from doing that 80% in the time you have available as opposed to the time it should take which could be more or less?  If you speed everything up (i.e., the reverse of Parkinson’s Law) what is going to keep you from burn out or worse a medical condition due to stress?

When I think about urgency, I think it is very important to take into account both items – Parkinson’s Law and the Pareto Principle. Do what is important as efficiently as possible without cutting corners. The key to being a good leader and manager is to help employees understand the difference and how both come together to make personal productivity and ultimately satisfaction increase. The net result is Smart Urgency.

-Dana

Free AT&T Minutes

For those interested, if you text “yes” to 11113020, AT&T will give you 1,000 freerollover minutes. I don’t know how long it will last so go give it a try! Thank you for the free minutes, AT&T, and thank you for the great Wow customer experience!

-Dana

Crazier Look? Lucy or Bear Woods?

What the heck?!? Ok, so which looks crazier? I know which one is scarier.

-Dana

Believe it or not …

… this dog is actually smart. Here is yet another great picture that Jill took of the dog.

-Dana

Tiny Dragons Testing is Done!

The videos finally uploaded to YouTube for the Tiny Dragons. My favorite is watching the kids do jumping jacks. I hope you enjoy them.

-Dana

White Belt Testing is Done!

Buddy’s white belt testing is done and I think for a seven year old that he nailed his form and one steps. His form was Ki-Bon and if you check earlier posts, you can see that he has come a long way. He held his last sitting stance really well. For his one steps, the video is not as good because he moved to the front of the class but you can see that he was into it and did his best.

Now, we wait until Feb 9 to see if Mr. Martin agrees that he did a great job!

-Dana